5
$\begingroup$

Inspired by this question (Isometric embedding of a real-analytic Riemannian manifold in a compact Kähler manifold) I ask the following:

Suppose $X$ is a real analytic Riemannian manifold with a totally real embedding to $X^\mathbb C$ which is K?hler and the K?hler metric restricts to the given Riemannian metric on $X$. Moreover, $X^\mathbb C$ is equipped with an antiholomorphic involution whose fixed point set is $X$. Does these properties determine $X^\mathbb C$ uniquely as a germ of manifolds? I believe that's true but I haven't found the precise statement of this fact in Lempert, Sz?ke or Guillemin, Stenzel.

Now let $X$ be compact. In the answer to the cited question D.Panov said some necessary words about how to prove that $X^\mathbb C$ can be chosen to be compact. But can $X^\mathbb C$ be chosen is some canonical way or perhaps it is even unique?

In fact I'm even more interested in the case then $X$ is K?hler manifold with a totally real embedding to a hyperk?hler $X^\mathbb C$ such that the restriction of the associated K?hler structure to $X$ is the given K?hler structure. Moreover we are given a $S^1$ action which rotates the complex structures and whose fixed point set is $X$. Feix and Kaledin proved that these properties determine $X^\mathbb C$ uniquely as a germ. If $X$ is complete can $X^\mathbb C$ be chosen to be complete? Canonically? Uniquely? As I understand the last questions are far from being solved.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.