3
$\begingroup$

This is a naive question. Consider the Julia sets of the map $$ z \mapsto z^n + \lambda / z^k $$ with $z,\lambda \in \mathbb{C}$, and the exponents $n,k \in \mathbb{N}$. For example, for $n=k=3$, here are three Julia sets depictions for three different (relatively small) $\lambda$'s:


          z^3 & lambdas
          L-to-R:    $\lambda=0.2-0.1 i$;   $\lambda=2-i$;    $\lambda=0.07-0.5i$.
There is obvious hexagonal symmetry independent of $\lambda$. My question is:

Q. Given $n$ and $k$, are the symmetries of the Julia sets of this map, for relatively small $\lambda$, known? Should they always have $(n+k)$-gon-like symmetries?

I can imagine that many details of these maps are unknown, but perhaps at this high-level viewpoint, the gross structure of the Julia sets is known? So for $n=4$ and $k=5$, should we expect to see nonagonal symmetries?

$\endgroup$
8
$\begingroup$

Yes. Let $\zeta=e^{2\pi i/(k+n)}$. Then $f(\zeta^j z)=\zeta^{nj}f(z)$. Iterating this, the orbit of $\zeta^j z$ agrees with the orbit of $z$ up to multiplying by powers of $\zeta$. In particular, $z$ lies in the Julia set if and only if $\zeta z$ lies in the Julia set.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you! ${}$ $\endgroup$ – Joseph O'Rourke Mar 16 at 13:09

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.